Like the title says: it's what *I* hate. And yes, for ME creampies are the biggest waste as a finale for a scene.
[Link]
Dragon Sign Deactivated User
3381 Posts 12/13
Posted - Sep 18 2016 : 4:57AM
Okay, I get it. D33n has a list of complaints going and 8) is to be saluted from over here. Why the fuck do they do that, stepping on heads? This ain't some football for retards. I guess it's the director's responsibility to not let shit like that happen. That should be the whistleblower, that's the spectator number one, standing first in line and the only one to put things straight around here, waving offside should be the first thing to do when profesional faults happen. If the guy won't listen he/she should start kick some ass.
[Link]
Dragon Sign Deactivated User
3381 Posts 12/13
Posted - Sep 18 2016 : 5:05AM
Fellow D33n has got things straightened out, he should be nominated for some prize in the department of good journalism by that list. Someone over in the Lana Rhoades thread talked about Pulitzer prize or something like that. Yeah, I'll see where his ass is coming from now. These are some digging hardcore quality journalism full of skeptical point of views going over here, with severe hardcore datas brought to the table for the public eye to see. Edited by - Dragon Sign on 9/18/2016 5:06:06 AM
Constant editing. Every few seconds the scene cuts away. Not only is it hard to enjoy, I actually get a headache seeing it. I could never watch Taryn Thomas's scene in 'Sperm Receptacles 2' due to this. And I just got 'Feeding Frenzy 7' and1 it's basically every scene.
life's to short to watch shitty porn 51 Posts 9/16
Posted - Sep 26 2016 : 5:57PM
a chick saying "shit"during anal.I never know if it's a warning or not. Chicks who just lay there like a corpse.the lack of good sex and knowledge ,passion and creativity of guys and women who are in the business of fucking.The lack of good fucking. guys jerking off on chicks for the shot,old old old.You get a woman who wants to filmed fucking and it's blurry,the lights bad,the angle sucks,the director won't shut the fuck up,the set can be scene in a mirror, all can make a hot scene suck.Having a guy with a 10 inch cock and is just tippin.lame. The lack of good dirty talk.fake tits.films that claim 1st time anal and clearly are not.fake cumming dicks with a gallon of what the ever that shit is.fat dudes fucking.the lack of really good gaggers.there's a lot of bad pizza out there
Renting/buying a video because there is this awesome cover and once you watch it, content has zero to do with it, I know they use photoshop, but some performers in the movie don't even look remotely like the ones portrayed on the covers.
I could be that kind of annoying guy who always complains of a male performer for several reasons but nothing beats what I call the "omnipresence of a performer." That's when several studios and directors hire the guy for a lot of scenes, "first anal"? Oh that actor x, "will film the pornstar that is highlighted? That same guy would be perfect, "first scene in a major studio"? We repeat the same guy," this girl did a scene with this guy in another studio but we will repeat again in our studio because always work"."It pisses me too much because I have seen so many times this guy in a scene that can not stand it. I know, sometimes it gets MPOTY two, three times in a row, best scene x several times and should be scaled as often as necessary but please, do not overload consumers with the same male perfome...
Splitting a video in several parts and release them like it was a tv series or a Hollywood super production, to be continued style, I mean.....really??
I hate porn logic. Damn near every director is guilty of this. Let's use Layla London as an example. She has nice natural tits and a nice ass. But since the scene or movie is called Big Tits at Play, we never get to see the chick's ass. I HATE IT!
[Link]
Dragon Sign Deactivated User
3381 Posts 12/13
Posted - Oct 9 2016 : 7:06PM
Well if this was some kinda revolution going now I'd say porndirectors do not stand up for their rights and lay low when it comes to titles and following up with a solid story. But there's exceptions. Evil Angel is best in class. Quite prolific fellas. Mike Adriano seems to hit the ball in every analfixated try. Which robot does not? I predict every movie with anal in it will stand and have a chance untill California slides into the ocean, but I'm not sure I'll love it.
Couldn't agree more. I own most Big Wet Ass movies from elegant angel and you'd be hard pressed to find a tittie or even a face during the intros to each scene, I was so obsessed with asses I forgot how great women look just stood facing you. A better title would be Big Wet Asses 'oh and the rest'.
[Link]
Dragon Sign Deactivated User
3381 Posts 12/13
Posted - Oct 9 2016 : 7:59PM
Yeah Elegant Angel is Big League to me. To every one. I have about seven Cuties volumes. I guess there are cutiness to be found all the time. Combat Zone was on a roll in 2006. Their The Girl Next Door volumes. Well I have them all except from one or two late ones. That's girl NeXT door thru and thru. Same with Diabloic back in 2007. Spring Chickens, I have about each from volume 15-23 or so. It's flowing full of Spring Chickens. So is the situation regarding New to the Game. They're all New to the game. I got them all from 1 to around 10. So this is not a so and so dark matter after all.
[Link]
Dragon Sign Deactivated User
3381 Posts 12/13
Posted - Oct 9 2016 : 8:03PM
Probably IR said someone. Well, I have yet to see a complete disappointment. One of my favorite compilations is brought by New Sensations. Monster Cocks or something like that. In fact there's not a single wiener in there. Believe it or not.
Hated it in the mid-80s, hate that they still do it now. The difference? The interwebs - there's really no reason to be buying stuff that you know nothing about. That doesn't stop most commercial discs/streams being journeyman fare from competent performers. Fanboys/fangirls of certain studios will schill relentlessly on ADT about the superiority of their favorite producer/director but porn is like proprietary software - an oligopoly where development is in the hands of a narrow set of individuals. A lot of shite is foisted upon the porn consumer simply due to the fact that 'independent' industry criticism and feedback is marginal to non-existent - compare this to mainstream entertainment where high technical and artistic standards are enforced by the fact that every person and their canine are watching and commenting. Books. Cover. Judgments. Caveat emptor.
[Link]
10000 days Deactivated User
Keep on trolling. What a bullshit! Im fucking unstoppable now ... 717 Posts 3/06
Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 8:43PM
Anyone else despise male performers that have signature moves? Like they do the same shit in every scene that makes the sex mechanical and dull? Also male performers that think they are the star and try to dominate the scene and overshadow the female. No, we don't want to see you swamp her face with your ballsack. No, we don't want to see you aggressively rub her clit when we can clearly see that she doesn't want you to do that!
[Link]
DiamondJackman Deactivated User
Straight From My Brown Balls, Using Good Pussy 501 Posts 10/15
Posted - Oct 12 2016 : 2:20AM
^Loool....Prince Yahshua!
[Link]
Dragon Sign Deactivated User
3381 Posts 12/13
Posted - Oct 12 2016 : 7:26AM
In fact that's why I have yet to get thru Prince The Punisher, not because it was way too hot, oh no, no, no, I just haven't seen it more than once, and I did not get off, I just lost patience. There was way too much oral domination, pushing chicks on to cock untill they're puking saliva, like if that was my fucking cup of tea and that cock was able to suck chicks in like if it was some kinda hungy monstershow - it's not. I'm used to getting great reverse gang bang movies rolling, this just wasn't one, just hyped, hyped, hyped. And the lightning was dull if I don't remember wrong, trees outside of a window was simply grey. And that's when you know something is not done right.
Bad bad tattoo's . Started to watch a scene with Avalon Heart , new and cute , then she shows her very nice tits with awful tattoo's on both nipples , why the hell would you do that . Number two , a long time bugaboo with me , no view of the face as the initial anal insertion takes place . Nothing ruins a good anal scene without a nice look at the woman's face as she is initially entered .
Fly Eagles Fly Super Bowl LII Champions Nova Nation 2016 and 2018 National Champions 5180 Posts 2/16
Posted - Oct 14 2016 : 3:05PM
I agree with you, Brazzers does that and it's annoying, especially when they put the scene in slow motion, that annoys me as well. Porn and music isn't a good combination.
Very specific one: Male performers who botch the cowgirl/reverse cowgirl positions on couches. What will happen is that the male performer will lay across the couch cushions, like a person would normally lay on a couch, and then attempt to thrust rapidly up into the female performer. But because the couch cushions are underneath him, he can't really thrust downward enough to pick up momentum. So it ends up looking really awkward and underwhelming. Male performers need to hang their asses off the couch if they want to get some serious strokes going: http://i.imgur.com/RcFKhNo.jpg http://i.imgur.com/CjTf2HN.gif Mark Ashley was always good at this.
[Link]
Dragon Sign Deactivated User
3381 Posts 12/13
Posted - Oct 15 2016 : 5:14AM
Good notion there, I like when details are being nailed. That's what experts are supposed to do. People saying they don't like to watch the stud's face, and won't care about who they are, must have been missing something. They should have Mark Ashley figured out by now. His way of fucking laying down was also always excellent. There are so many scenes where chicks ride him from the side, standing on their knees with their face in another direction, and everything will be captured as in standing doggy, but with Mark still with back on the couch, not visuable if you didn't knew it was him or reckognized that it was his cock. All you see is his fast swollen penetrating cock furiously banging a chick's overflowing wet pussy from behind, and that ass will fill about 79% out of the screen for a minute or two at the end of the scene. The 20% is his cock. And that's so a 100% great capturing. And cameraman/woman will have an easy task. (The 1 % is orgasmic juices by the way.) Edited by - Dragon Sign on 10/15/2016 5:17:00 AM
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Oct 16 2016 : 6:56PM
It is ironic that some viewers can understand more about sex mechanics than a whole army of directors. Of course it is not that simple, but this ass hanging trick can solve several problems in sexual engineering, especially in more elaborated actions like DPs.
Bad video edition, sometimes you get a cut in mid scene that makes no sense at all, a few are make to hide some bad or embarrassing moment, but most are simply made to fit the time length, ruining the end result. :-(
[Link]
Big Jilm Deactivated User
25 Posts 1/14
Posted - Oct 18 2016 : 11:31AM
1. I hate that sites don't offer full-screen, high resolution photos. Like at Realitykings, Brazzers and NaughtyAmerica. What is the point of even offering photos if they are so tiny and low res? They even take the time to airbrush these terrible photos. Do it right, offer full-screen, realistic, high res-photos for fuck's sakes. You think these sites would realize the better their product is the more business they get. 2. I hate it when sites continue to roll out the same, tired male talent even though they are absolutely despised by their customers. Jmac at Realitykings and now Mofos is a good example. Hated by the site's customers, yet they keep using them year after year to low ratings and customer complaints. Seems like a guaranteed way to drive away customers again. 3. Bad direction/camera work. Just a camera set up in one spot with the same positions from the same angles or close up POV scenes where you don't even get to see the girl.
I like looking for pics that make good desktop wallpapers but it's like finding a needle in a haystack. Some issues: -Most pics are portrait format rather than widescreen -Even if wide pictures are provided the resolution is likely shit -Pictures are airbrushed to crazy levels -Not enough variety of poses -I like variety and a little class and don't mind seeing clothes on a girl before she gets naked. Unfortunately a lot of sets already have the girl in lingerie or we get like 2 pictures of clothes on -I don't mind cumshot pics but I'd rather there not be a cock taking up some of the picture. I just want to see a pretty face dripping cum -Sites like ATK have a lot of softcore content but their sets and outfits are just boring. A place like Digital Desire gets it right but the quantity of sets of our favorite girls is usually low. At Twistys the girls are too glamoured up in my opinion -Poses we need more of: Rear view with girl bending over if in a skirt or other tight clothing, showing cleavage while dressed, girl on her knees looking up at the camera, laying on a sofa/bed with body and face facing the camera
Horrible make up, some movies have this awesome female performer that looks really awful when their makeup crew lay hands on her face ruining a beautiful actress.
[Link]
bacon cheesesteak Deactivated User
247 Posts 1/16
Posted - Oct 20 2016 : 3:22PM
I dislike scenes where there are more dicks than pussies. For threesomes and up, there should ALWAYS be more pussy than dick. Directors/camera people who think I want a close up of the guy's face when he's coming. I do NOT want this. POV. It just sucks. Non face related cum shots. And NOT on the forehead. Who the fuck wants to cum on a girl's forehead when there's a perfectly good mouth right there. I make an occasional exception for a girl like Kleio Valentien but girls with Burning Angel level of tattoos or just a bunch of stupid, random, shitty tattoos are a turnoff. Some tats a cool but zombies, guns, cartoon characters etc... are not. Scenes set in dental offices, business offices, garages, bathrooms. Go find a soft surface. I love Rocco movies but he always seems to have an outdoor scene or two where the lighting is all fucked up. And for God's sake, no more fucking on the sand or on a rocky beach. Private does this shit all the time or at least they used to. I haven't seen a Private clip in a while.
This. There are some very hot girls out there with some very ugly/ridiculous/dumb tattoos. My heart sunk when one of my favs Marilyn Mayson got a HUGE tattoo of John Travolta (as Danny from Grease) tattooed on her leg. Cannot fap to that.
First of all i despise all anal sex and thinks that it is foremost humiliating for the female model who only do this because she is paid more money. There is no sexual feelings in the butthole but for me as a male who have a similar butthole it feels very good when I have managed to make a really good poop although there is nothing sexual about that. There is no wish for me to put another mans dick there and I think women in general feel the same way,Some porn providers think that is what we male pornviewers most like to watch but I think that they are wrong. The second things that annoys me is then a very goodlooking model like for instance Amia Miley, Rebeca Linares or Jessa Rhodes makes an ugly boobjob and looks like theya are having two hard ballons with nipples instead of the wonderful tits that they have destroyed, I understand if a wannabe pornstar that is very flat want to have some curves or an older model wants to correct her boobs that is startig to get sagging and I accept that. But it is rare to see nice looking artificial boobs even if the quality among the plastic surgeons work has improved over the years and if anybody can show me a model that has a pair of perfect looking silicon boobs I notify it and thank you for showing that I can be wrong sometimes. My third thing is when the models have their eyes closed all the time. I love looking in the eyes of a beautiful horny woman when she is doing explicit hardcore. Edited by - pornomaniac on 10/21/2016 1:51:35 PM Edited by - pornomaniac on 10/21/2016 1:52:35 PM
Do you really believe that any of these people are performing for free? Even if many women in porn are exhibitionists, they still have to make a living. Ergo, 'only doing it for the money' is a pointless argument. As for anal sex being humiliating, pffft. Stop trying to assign your sexual mores to the entire human race. We don't need your stinking mores. (bonus points if you can name the movie I'm misquoting) "There is no sexual feelings in the butthole but for me as a male who have a similar butthole it feels very good when I have managed to make a really good poop although there is nothing sexual about that." Your idea of sexual feeling is simplistic to the point of being useless. Your brain is not hard-wired as to what feels good and what doesn't, any more than it is hard-wired as to what tastes good and what doesn't. So, if you don't try telling people what they have to like in the way of food, why are you trying to tell other people what sex acts they have to like? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "There is no wish for me to put another mans dick there and I think women in general feel the same way." ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wait a minute, you do know that gay men have anal sex, right? Lots of anal sex. So, why can't any women have anal sex? Why can't women who have anal sex like it? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some porn providers think that is what we male pornviewers most like to watch but I think that they are wrong. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The providers follow the money. Okay, sometimes they try to get out ahead, but the consumption of anal porn, and the rate of said consumption, is hardly new, so it is safe to say that they are following the money. Of course, that doesn't prove everybody like anal sex, either in their porn or in real life, but it does disprove your critique.
Where did I write anyone should perform for free? Attractive models with good bodies should be get paid a lot of money when doing explicit vaginal sex but then they get offered even more when doing anal sex that you by now well know is not my taste at all. But I think that most women, even pros, is much more touched emotionally when she has a cock in her pussy compered to when it is in the rectum and I give you the advice you to take a cock inside your anus if you doing that thing it is a pleasure. And what concerns the gay male guys I think it is submission to the dominant male. The anus is not sex genitalia but the bodys way to remove the intestines of shit.
My point went to your belief that the 'female model' only doing anal sex for the money is somehow relevant, or different from every other porn act. If you're watching professionally made porn then you're watching people who are acting in order to get paid. Sure, they may say they love sex (most humans do), they may say they're exhibitionists (many of them are), but if porn didn't pay the bills they wouldn't be doing it. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- pornomaniac wrote: "Attractive models with good bodies should be get paid a lot of money when doing explicit vaginal sex but then they get offered even more when doing anal sex that you by now well know is not my taste at all." I do know; I just don't care. If it bothers you that much then offer to pay them more money to cater to your tastes. That will get you a lot further than complaining on the internet ever could. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- pornomaniac wrote: "But I think that most women, even pros, is much more touched emotionally when she has a cock in her pussy compered to when it is in the rectum" I think you may not understand sex, but I know that you really don't understand porn sex. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- pornomaniac wrote: "and what concerns the gay male guys I think it is submission to the dominant male." You should ask them, instead of basing your view upon assumptions. If I had to make an assumption, I would assume that gay men have sex for pleasure. As long as nobody gets hurt, I don't sweat the details. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- pornomaniac wrote: "The anus is not sex genitalia but the bodys way to remove the intestines of shit." You might have a point, if you can convince us to ignore the process of urination. Otherwise... not. Also, blowjobs are still sex, no matter what Bill Clinton may have led you to believe. Human sexuality isn't nearly as simple as you seem to think.
^ Totally agree with you about the multiple level wrongness of extended pre-come wanking, but what does really niggle me is the fact that it could be resolved by the simple act of editing. But then, asking why the simple remedy of excission is not employed inevitably leads you back into the mindfuck of "wrong on so many levels'...
[Link]
Luke Lake Deactivated User
878 Posts 8/10
Posted - Oct 22 2016 : 8:56AM
Scenes that show more man-ass than women Faked creampies that look like they poured a gallon of milk in a girls vagina (Missa X for example) POV Scenes with a girl with simulated sex. Who is that for? Also in the "What is your audience" category: CFNM= Clothed Female, Nude Male Women getting fucked and not moving/reacting (Like Robot/Dead videos) Movies where you can hear the director who's off camera Scenes where the music is louder than the actors (Primal's Superheroes are main culprits) And finally in the "Your odd" category: Sites that aren't Gonzo (Meaning a story/plot/dialogue/setup) saying "screw it" for like 5 scenes in a row and going gonzo.
Introducing Dallas Rea
Posted - Sep 17 2016 : 2:58PM
