I have to be honest I'm confused by the two posts above. When I watch B/G porn (which is the only type of porn I ever watch) I never imagine myself as actually being the guy in the scene. I'm pretty sure that other guys who watch porn don't do that either since it would be almost impossible. Ninja what exactly do you mean by "add my own personalized customized fantasy"? How can you do that if you are watching lesbian porn when there is no guy there? The whole point of lesbian porn is they are two women who are INTO OTHER WOMEN, not into men. That's why I find it funny/strange that all these straight guys are jerking off to girls who aren't even into them, it makes no sense like I said before guys who are into lesbians are almost semi-masochistic. Women are much smarter in this regard, how many women get off to gay guys? If anything they probably find two guys fucking each other disgusting. Edited by - Cloudburst on 5/7/2014 4:18:24 PM
Cloudburst: The processus is inconcious. You think that you don't imagine yourself as the guy, but your brain does, in a way that you know it's not you but it could be you or it's somebody like you. When I watch lesbo scenes I never think that they are not into men. (I wrote about it more on details above). Instead I like to think that they are into men but do lesbo sex for some reason. Whatever... everybody watches what he/she likes. This thread is about what sucks in porn productions, not what are our favirite genre, positions, combos... Oh, and FYI: I hate lesbo anal as much as B/G anal!!! I also hate (but this is serious) tongue piercing.
Maybe it's impossible for you. It's not impossible for guys who have imagination.Just because a woman is performing in a girl-girl scene, that doesn't necessarily mean she isn't into men. All it means is at the moment the scene was filmed, she was with another woman. Even if the woman only performs with other women, that doesn't necessarily mean she's not into men. She might prefer just to perform with women.Oh my goodness. You really don't know many women, do you? You do ask a lot of questions on these forums, which is cool, because that's what this forum is about - sharing information. But the theme that lies behind almost all of your questions seems to originate from one place - you have a really tough time understanding why other people don't think exactly like you. When watching porn, you can't picture yourself in the male star's position, so how can anyone else imagine themselves in that position? You don't like lesbian porn, so how can any guy like lesbian porn? Once you come to grips with the fact that there is a whole lot of other people in the world with tastes that may be completely different from yours, I think you'll find it liberating. Peace.
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - May 7 2014 : 7:45PM
How so? You mean you fantasize that YOU ARE ACTUALLY FUCKING the girl in the scene? I usually get off on just looking/viewing (i.e. the physical appearance and emotional reaction) the girl and how she either is into the sex, or is being submissive or dominant with the guy she's paired with, etc.
Yes.So do I. Watching her reactions and fantasizing about actually being the one fucking the girl aren't mutually exclusive. When you're actually having sex in real life, aren't you doing the same thing? Meaning you're watching her appearance and emotional reaction and gauging from her reactions how much she is enjoying herself? That's one of the reasons why I enjoy POV porn - the man becomes a "surrogate" for myself and the focus is completely on the woman. Therefore it's easier to imagine myself in his position. I can imagine it in non-POV porn too, but it's easier when watching POV porn. For me, though, I enjoy watching my own homemade porn that my wife and I have made. I don't actually have to imagine it's me because it is me.
I don't need a guy there. It's called imagination. I wrote a big long reply, but the essence is imagination. If you don't get it, more words won't help.
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - May 7 2014 : 9:30PM
^^ Wow, you must have a very good imagination. As far as POV porn goes I never understood it and have never once watched or enjoyed it. POV porn makes no sense and the camera angles look horrible where you can't really view the girl in the proper way, it's hard to explain but all I know is that IMO it's awful to watch. Edited by - Cloudburst on 5/7/2014 9:31:40 PM
You sure do have some strong opinions about something you've "never once watched or enjoyed.". Everyone is certainly entitled to their own opinion, but people who form negative opinions about something without ever having experienced it are ...well, let's just say you should probably attempt to be better informed before you say something is "horrible" and "awful".
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - May 8 2014 : 12:28AM
^^ I should clarify, I have watched POV porn before. What I meant was that I never watched it more than a minute or two before I checked out.
[Link]
urthoughts Deactivated User
it takes a real wolf to expose true sheep 2600 Posts 7/12
Posted - May 9 2014 : 3:45AM
Hate when a good position doesnt last long enough to wack off !!!! Dont ruin the moment
I dislike lots of things in porn, and the list grows longer with every year as porn becomes an ever more ridiculous display of outlandish acts and Neanderthal attitudes. I particularly hate copy-catyism: everybody makes gonzo - then everybody makes idiotic and unfunny "Parodies" - then everybody makes faux-incest, what I call "Mommy Porn". I have total contempt for the risk aversion of porn producers who will happily churn out formulaic product until someone proves to them that what they insisted can't be done (because it's expensive) is very easily done - witness the girl-girl revolution of around 2000 which proved that high production value sensual lez was possible and profitable. But today I will focus on one thing: how anal, a perfectly lovely and sensual sex act in real life, has become a ridiculous circus act, and a a way for men (viewers and producers alike) to take out their inexplicable hatred of women. Even non-aggressive anal scenes are ruined by continuous breaks to the action: change positions; arse-to-mouth; insert and re-insert; gaping. Whatever happened to just humping away at that lovely behind? The Russian website scenes like First Anal Quest have kind of avoided that problem, although there still feature too many acrobatic angles to allow visible penetration on camera. To their credit though, they mostly focus on continuous action, and have even brought some great natural positions into vogue (the pile-up doggy with the girl on her belly, and the "up against the wall" standing rear entry in particular). The best is the German pro-am label Purzel in their Anal Qual series (there are 16 iterations I think). The girls are ok looking at worst, and there are some genuine lookers now and then, and they are all natural. The action is very long, usually 30 minutes or longer. The couple change positions 4-5 times, but that's really the only break in the action. The rest is anal fucking with now stupid breaks in the action. Imp.
[Link]
Jedi Master Bates Deactivated User
383 Posts 9/11
Posted - May 9 2014 : 9:45AM
I hate how porn scenes are always shot in million dollar homes with all white backgrounds. Makes for a super sterile scene with no sense of fantasy. I may have said this before, but look at the old Assman and Euroangels series. Those movies had environments that you and I exist in everyday, but then you'd have insane anal sex happening where the girls would gape like crazy. So it was a scene that had crazy sex going on, but in a space that looks like you could walk through at anytime. Also, the girls back then wore regular mundane clothes that you'd expect any female to be wearing. These days, they only wear costumes or something that screams "i'm here for sex". Basically, the element of fantasy is gone. A great example of how cool things used to be would be kathy anderson in euroangels hardball 23. The scene starts off with her in a t-shirt while playing with a dildo. Suddenly it cuts to her in a fetish outfit and getting double teamed. The gapes were insane. It was like "hey here's your world, but here's whats underneath." That aspect made porn much hotter during the 2000's. Lighting wasn't perfect, which is preferred since lighting in the real world isn't always perfect. Edited by - Jedi Master Bates on 5/10/2014 1:33:02 PM
Sites that have 720p that are bigger than 1.8gb and 1080p that are 3gb+ I download mostly 720p. I can under stand like 45+ min scenes being big file size but 20 to 40 min scenes 720p should be 800mb to 1.4gb
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - May 12 2014 : 8:52PM
^^ I agree, no scene should really be more than 1GB at most even in HD format. Who the fuck wants one scene to take up that much space on your drive, yet all the time now you see HD scenes that are 1.3GB, 1.7GB, 1.9GB, etc..
720p is like 33mb to 40mb for 1min of video so a 30min would be like 1.2g to 1.3gb 1080p is like 45mb to 60mb for 1min of video so 30min is like 1.6gb Mofos 1080p scenes are like 80mb to 90mb for 1 min of video most scenes are 3.2 to 4gb way oversized when most sites for the same length of video would be 1.2gb to 1.8gb smaller
Youre lost or not following the thread trail. Read the sequence again. Using a codec that has the videos at 1 gig is better yhan 3. And if you expect some 500mb HD file, thats just impossible ----Dread's Twitter---- Edited by - dreadsynapse on 5/13/2014 11:54:31 PM
It bothers me to see fans pestering porn stars on social media (twitter, tumblr, etc.) and asking them to do sex acts they don't do such as boy/girl(to girl/girl only porn stars), anal, DP, interracial, gangbangs, etc. If you enjoy watching girls do these sex acts, then watch porn stars who actually do these sex acts already instead of wasting your time waiting for a girl to do it when she doesn't want to do it. I'm also not interested in films that advertise a porn star's "first" anal, DP, interracial, gangbang, etc. like it's a big deal, especially if the girl never does that sex act on film again (usually a good indication that she didn't actually enjoy doing it and did it only for the paycheck). A lot of these girls actually believe that "taking it slowly" will prolong their careers. Let's take a look at Belladonna. She had a very successful porn career which lasted over 10 years, and she did many extreme sex acts from the very beginning. Fans never got "tired" of seeing her do these sex acts. And the only reason why Belladonna's career ended was because she chose to retire on her own. If she ever wanted to make a comeback, or if she hadn't even retired in the first place, she would still be in high demand. Now, let's look at Alexis Ford. In almost every interview she did, she said she would prolong her career by "taking it slowly". She did her first anal, interracial, DP, and gangbang a little over a year ago and now she's retired. Or how about Jesse Jane, who has been in porn for over 10 years so far, hasn't done anal, DP's, interracial, gangbangs, etc. and probably never will, and she is still very popular. There you go, "taking it slowly prolongs porn career" myth debunked. And I only enjoy watching anal, DP's, interracial, gangbangs, etc. when they're done by girls who do them on a regular basis and actually enjoy them, so when companies advertise a movie by saying it includes a girl's "first" anything, it makes me NOT want to watch it. So, that would be like 90% of all movies from Elegant Angel. I also hate to see porn stars retire, especially when they're still in their 20's. I hate to hear porn stars in interviews discuss their after porn plans and talk about how "you can't do porn forever". Excuse me, but haven't you girls heard of the MILF genre and how popular it is? I honestly wish to see all of my favorite porn stars do porn forever, just like Nina Hartley.
I can tolerate tattoos but I hate girls with shaved heads. I hate fake tits. I like the girls who keep it natural. I love "elegant angel" videos but the opening tease with the girl dancing is stupid and a waste of time. I hate all the porn parody videos. they are all lame. the kardashian parody video might be a partial exception. I think kris jenner is friggin adorable, so any short-haired pornstar who does a parody of kris jenner is sexy to me. when a girl is really creaming on a guys cock, I want to hear some discussion in the scene about it. I want to hear somebody say something about it. "you really fucking creamed on my cock" or if its a threesome, then the other girl should say something like, "holy shit, look at all that pussy cream.." ....I hate Rita Faltoyano's moles. I love miley cyrus, but the girl who played miley cyrus in a porn parody was hideously ugly and had nasty skin. ....like six years I first say the pornstar Friday in a porn magazine. then looked for her in videos. seems like she was too friggin loopy from beginning to end in every video. never really knew if she was turned on and was going to cum or not.
my biggest complaint. I hate when porn producers edit scenes. just let them go from beginning to end. don't edit the shit. don't make them stop fucking. don't splice piece of scenes together. keep it natural. maintain the flow. let the performers maintain the heat of the moment.
hornbunny.com and forbiddenfruitsfilms.com are two small production companies that have gotten into the incest theme. I know, some of you think that's sick and twisted. It turns me on. Gloria leonard and Tom Byron were doing the mother-son theme in "taboo American style" in the 1980s. Im not going off topic here. What I hate is porn videos that put out a release advertised and titled as a family roleplay, and then you read the fine-print and the story acted out is a step-parent and step-child. Really, guys? c'mon. have the guts to give us an incest story like Gloria leonard and tom Byron did in the 1980s.
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - May 20 2014 : 10:56PM
So you get sexually aroused by incest? Wow, truly sick. I won't say much more here because I'll probably get into trouble with the forum rules but all I can say is I hope you don't have any children or nieces/nephews to potentially molest.
^ Relax dude. It's a fantasy porn scenario, and in fact it's an extremely common one. Have you ever heard of the Taboo series of movies from the 80's? They were big. Really big. They weren't just being watched by child molesters. Also, the scenes are always between adults. That's pretty key here. It's just another example of 'forbidden lust'. Most viewers have no plans to act on that shit. [edit: typo] Edited by - killbillvol69 on 5/21/2014 12:37:18 AM
"You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10
Posted - May 21 2014 : 6:45AM
Incest and child abuse are two different things. In porn, in particular, you will never see incest portrayed that even hints at underage participants, much less pedophiles. How about we don't get baited into a stupid non-argument? "And, he practiced nepotism, with his niece."
^ Surely schoolgirl porn and the type of stuff purveyed by Max Hardcore is 'hinting' - blatantly so, if you ask me - at underage participants? Why is it different if you're shooting an 'incest' scene?
"You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10
Posted - May 21 2014 : 10:30AM
Again, Incest and child abuse are two different things. Since when is "schoolgirl porn" incest? Why do you insist on falsely conflating the two? And, again, I said "In porn, in particular, you will never see incest portrayed that even hints at underage participants, much less pedophiles." Why do you waste so much time always trying to put words into people's mouths, and arguing against thoughts and points they never said?
^ So you can have porn that hints at underage participants and you can have 'incest' porn but you can't combine the two? Why? That's all I want to know. Goldstein, you really need to take a chill pill and understand that I'm not making personal attacks on you or your views or just being argumentative for its own sake. I think I'm asking a perfectly valid question and I'm not aiming it at any one individual - it's for anyone to answer. Peace & love, buddy.
when it comes to angels i agree with Tank Dog, i don't care about watching a penis go into a vagina and nothing else is on the screen. that shits boring to me yet some camera men (especially the guy who calls himself Destry and Destrodamus) film that for like 5 minutes straight. i wanna see the girls face and body in action
when it comes to angels i agree with Tank Dog, i don't care about watching a penis go into a vagina and nothing else is on the screen. that shits boring to me yet some camera men (especially the guy who calls himself Destry and Destrodamus) film that for like 5 minutes straight. i wanna see the girls face and body in action
I hate too many far away shots. I dont need to see a bookshelf 10 feet away from the action. On that note I dont need to see a zoomed in vag for 8 minutes straight.
[Link]
urthoughts Deactivated User
it takes a real wolf to expose true sheep 2600 Posts 7/12
Posted - May 24 2014 : 8:48PM
Think max hardcore spent some time n the court house explaining his style of porn
What Have You Done To My Little Cable Boy? 2966 Posts 5/10
Posted - May 25 2014 : 5:29AM
I hate bad lighting and 'false advertising'. Promo pic for a brazzers scene Filthy Fuck : Part Two with AJ Applegate and Savannah Fox. [Image was administratively deleted] Good lightnig, everything is fine. Actual picture quality. [mod edit: image removed. see the image policy. No cropped, blurred or digitally manipulated images of sex acts. Don't take an image that would otherwise not comply with this policy and modify the offending region from the image. If the original image doesn't comply with this policy it can't be used.] Dark as hell and more shadows than everything else. Some directors really don't know what they are doing. They just don't care about the product.
Edited by - killbillvol69 on 5/25/2014 12:40:19 PM
Spitting in mouths, drooling, implied force, excessive shots of the guys face, lingering on gyno shots for too long, lengthy setup scenes, and I hate lines that use the exact same setup every single time, with the same positions and angles every time. You see this a lot on websites, and you used to get that in the Ed Powers lines. Dude was super boring. Only reason to watch any of those was for the early scenes of certain stars, or up and cummers that never really made it big but were really hot.
Different strokes. I absolutely LOVE when they show a girl with a strap-on doing the other girl doggy style. But only if it is shown with the camera facing the girl with the strap-on. Not nearly as good if the camera is behind her.
I have heard at least a couple girl porn stars say that they love watching gay porn. I think Chloe was one of them. Makes sense for the same reason some guys like g/g. If you are attracted to the opposite sex, two is better than one, no? As for someone wondering why straight guys like watching g/g scenes, it's because of what I just said. The more girls to watch the better. Two hot girls going at each other is hot. One thing I don't like though in straight porn is watching a guy eating pussy. That does nothing for me.
Some scenes are even over 5 gigs. However, what you can do is convert those files and edit out the filler, which greatly reduces the size of the file. But that is time consuming.
